首页> 外文OA文献 >Should Angel-Backed Start-ups Reject Venture Capital?
【2h】

Should Angel-Backed Start-ups Reject Venture Capital?

机译:天使投资的初创企业是否应该拒绝风险投资?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The conventional wisdom is that entrepreneurs seek financing for their high-growth, high-risk start-up companies in a particular order. They begin with friends, family, and \u22bootstrapping\u22 (e.g., credit card debt). Next they turn to angel investors, or accredited investors (and usually ex-entrepreneurs) who invest their own money in multiple, early-stage start-ups. Finally, after angel funds run dry, entrepreneurs seek funding from venture capitalists (VCs), whose deep pockets and connections lead the startup to an initial public offering (IPO) or sale to a larger company in the same industry (trade sale).That conventional wisdom may have been the model for start-up success in the past, but this Article challenges its continuing applicability. In particular, this Article argues that some start-ups that attract angel funding should stop there, rejecting offers of venture capital. It challenges the notion that venture capital is a necessary condition for start-up success and argues the counterintuitive proposition that venture capital may actually be harmful to entrepreneurs and angel investors in some situations.
机译:传统的看法是,企业家按特定顺序为其高增长,高风险的初创公司寻求融资。他们从朋友,家人和\ u22开始(例如信用卡债务)。接下来,他们转向天使投资人或认可的投资人(通常是前企业家),他们将自己的资金投资于多个早期阶段的初创企业。最终,在天使资金枯竭之后,企业家们向风险投资家(VC)寻求资金,他们的雄厚财力和联系使这家初创公司进行了首次公开募股(IPO)或出售给了同一行业中的一家较大的公司(贸易出售)。过去,传统观念可能是成功创业的典范,但本文对它的持续适用性提出了挑战。特别是,本文认为,一些吸引天使投资的初创企业应在此停止,拒绝提供风险投资。它质疑风险资本是启动成功的必要条件的观点,并提出了违反直觉的主张,即风险资本在某些情况下实际上可能对企业家和天使投资者有害。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ibrahim, Darian M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号